DISTINGUISHING WARRANTY EXPIRATION FROM STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS' EXPIRATION FOR FLORIDA CONDOMINIUM AND HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS

A warranty period in the context of condominium and homeowner association construction warranties is the finite period of time that the quality of a particular building component is guaranteed by a developer, general contractor, etc.  A statute of limitations in the context of a warranty claim is the period of time during which a claim on the warranty must be filed in court to preserve the warranty claim.  These time periods are often confused.   Hopefully, this post will help clarify the matter.

Florida Condominium Warranties

 a.  Warranty Expiration

For new condominiums, per Florida Statute 718.203, statutory warranties extend from the developer, contractor, sub-contractors, material suppliers and manufacturers to original and subsequent purchasers for the stated periods of time in the statute.  For conversions, per Florida Statute 718.618, assuming lack of adequate reserve funding, warranties extend solely from the developer to original and subsequent purchasers for the stated period of time in the statute.  Express warranties (warranties created by contract) extend for the period of time stated in the contract. Common law implied warranties  (warranties created by court decision), to the extent they are not disclaimed, extend from the developer to original purchasers for up to ten years.  Most developers effectively disclaim implied warranties in their contracts.  In order for a defect to be covered under a statutory or express warranty, it must be discovered during the warranty period.

b.  Statute of Limitations Expiration

Ordinarily, the statute of limitations for pursuing a warranty claim in court would be four years from date of discovery.  However, Florida Statute 718.124 provides that no cause of action on behalf of a condominium association accrues until transition of the Association to unit owner control (turnover).  Consequently, the statute of limitations for a condominium association pursuing a warranty claim is four years from discovery or four years from transition, whichever is latest, but in no case more than 10 years from issuance of the certificate of occupancy.  Express warranty claims can be pursued only by original purchasers and must be pursued within four years of date of discovery but in no case more than 10 years from the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.  A claim is preserved by filing suit, although placing a party on notice of a claim pursuant to Chapter 558, Florida Statutes has the effect of extending statutes of limitation for a finite period as defined in the statute.  A Chapter 558 notice, however, does not extend the limitations period for a building whose certificate of occupancy issuance is approaching its ten-year anniversary.

Florida Homeowner Association Warranties

a.  Warranty Expiration

There are no statutory warranties applicable to homeowner associations.  There is also no equivalent of Florida Statute 718.124 applicable to homeowner associations.  Thus, only common law and express warranties apply to homeowner associations.   Express warranties extend for the period of time stated in the contract. Common law implied warranties, to the extent they are not disclaimed, extend from the developer to original purchasers for up to ten years from the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy.  Most developers effectively disclaim implied warranties in their contracts.  In order for a defect to be covered under an express warranty, it must be discovered during the warranty period.

b.  Statute of Limitations Expiration

The statute of limitations for pursuing a warranty claim in court is four years from date of discovery, but in no case more than ten years after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.  A claim is preserved by filing suit, although placing a party on notice of a claim pursuant to Chapter 558, Florida Statutes has the effect of extending statutes of limitation for a finite period as defined in the statute,   A Chapter 558 notice, however, does not extend the limitations period for a building whose certificate of occupancy issuance is approaching its ten-year anniversary.

CAI Suncoast Breakfast: Legal Panel Q&A

Community Associations Institute - Suncoast Chapter:  Come have breakfast while CAI provides you updated information valuable to every board member and every unit/homeowner as an aid in providing the best management of your association.

“Almost” Free Legal Advice

Speakers:   Alan Tannenbaum, Esq. – Levin Tannenbaum

                 Michael Brudny, Esq. - Brudny & Rabin, P.A.

                 Jonathan Damonte, Esq. – Jonathan James Damonte, Chartered  

                 Anne Hathorne, Esq. – Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.       

 

                                                                                         

Where:     Holiday Inn Select **NEW LOCATION**

                    3535 Ulmerton Road, Clearwater                        

When:      Thursday, February 12, 2009                

                   Breakfast 8:30 AM, Program 9:00 AM

 

 Cost:         $15.00 each CAI Member/$20.00 each non-member 

Please RSVP by Monday, February 9, 2009.   

Payment in advance is appreciated – No shows will be billed.

Program Sponsor

Alderman & Price Associates, CPA’s

Progressive Management

Habitat for Humanity Sponsors

Bay Area Disaster Kleenup

___________________________________________________________

Breakfast Registration                                               February 12, 2009

CAI Member? Yes _____ No _____ Late Registration_____

Company:_____________________________________________________________________

Name(s): _____________________                                                                                           

Phone:                                                              Number people to attend: _________________

 

Amount Enclosed:                                

Reservations MUST be in writing. This is your invoice.

 You may fax your reservation to (727) 345-0170 or email lhagan@suncoastcai.com.

Mail payment to:

CAI – Suncoast, 5701 – 1st Avenue South, Suite A, St. Petersburg, Florida 33707       

Please make check payable to CAI Suncoast – NO Credit Cards Accepted

Phone: 727-345-0165  Fax: 727-345-0170

Finally...Automatic Class Action Standing for Florida Homeowner Associations

Until 2008, Florida condominium associations had a distinct advantage over Florida homeowner associations as far as pursuing construction defect and financial claims on a class action basis. Basically, Florida condominium associations by court rule since 1977 had automatic standing to represent their owners as a class on matters of common interest. Florida homeowner associations, on the other hand, had no standing to represent their members as a class. Members of homeowner associations were relegated to bringing a traditional class action with individual members acting as class representatives on behalf of the members. The procedure for attaining class action status in a homeowner association context was cumbersome and time consuming.

The newly adopted Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.221 reads:

HOMEOWNERS AND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATIONS

A homeowners' or condominium association, after control of such association is obtained by homeowners or unit owners other than the developer, may institute, maintain, settle, or appeal actions or hearings in its name on behalf of all association members concerning matters of common interest to the members, including, but not limited to: (1) the common property, area, or elements; (2) the roof or structural components of a building, or other improvements (in the case of homeowners. associations, being specifically limited to those improvements for which the association is responsible); (3) mechanical, electrical, or plumbing elements serving a property or an improvement or building (in the case of homeowners. associations, being specifically limited to those elements for which the association is responsible); (4) representations of the developer pertaining to any existing or proposed commonly used facility; (5) protests of ad valorem taxes on commonly used facilities; and, in the case of homeowners' associations, (6) defense of actions in eminent domain or prosecution of inverse condemnation actions. If an association has the authority to maintain a class action under this rule, the association may be joined in an action as representative of that class with reference to litigation and disputes involving the matters for which the association could bring a class action under this rule. Nothing herein limits any statutory or common law right of any individual homeowner or unit owner, or class of such owners, to bring any action that may otherwise be available. An action under this rule shall not be subject to the requirements of rule 1.220.

Unfortunately, what the Florida Supreme Court did in providing automatic class action standing for homeowner associations was not coupled with the Florida Legislature, as it had done long ago for condominium associations (F.S. 718.203), inserting developer and contractor warranties of fitness and merchantability into F.S. Chapter 720 (homeowner associations). As a result, even though the procedure to get into court as a class has been made significantly easier for member of homeowner associations, identifying sustainable causes of action for securing compensation remains a challenge.